Action
This is filler text
Decision
Clearly consenting party? Not mentally altered or incapacitated?
Background
The AHRQ outlines 7 elements of a complete informed consent process:
- Discussing the patient’s role in the decision-making process
- Describing the clinical issue and suggested treatment
- Discussing alternatives to the suggested treatment (including the option of no treatment)
- Discussing risks and benefits of the suggested treatment (and comparing them to the risks and benefits of alternatives)
- Discussing related uncertainties
- Assessing the patient’s understanding of the information provided
- Eliciting the patient’s preference (and thereby consent).
Not every detail needs to be discussed, but all details needed for a reasonable person to make a decision must be provided. Therefore, all risks of serious complications, even if they occur very rarely, need to be discussed. Less-serious risks need to be discussed if they occur more commonly. In addition, the patient or person providing informed consent must be competent and have capacity to make the decision. In the case of a guardian or surrogate providing informed consent, that person must have the legal authority to do so.
While only 1 parent’s consent is needed if they both have legal custody, best practice involves communicating with both parents, even though this is often difficult to navigate in a busy ED. This is especially important in situations of unmarried or divorced parents when there is increased likelihood of disagreement between the parties. If the clinician is made aware of such a situation, we recommend making a good-faith effort to contact the parent not present and documenting these attempts and outcomes. Establishing good rapport with both parents can increase goodwill and decrease the likelihood of conflict later on. Practitioners should check with their institution’s legal counsel regarding their state’s laws on parental guardianship and consent as well as on particular circumstances regarding a patient if legal guardianship is not clear.
To determine capacity, physicians need to assess whether a patient is capable of the following:
- Understanding relevant information, such as the diagnosis, indications for treatment, risks and benefits, and alternatives
- Expressing a decision
- Appreciating how the information applies to oneself
- Using reasoning to compare options and understand their consequences.
Some clinical conditions, such as intoxication, unconsciousness, or other neurologic impairment, can affect a patient’s capacity.
- Thomasma DC. Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: a model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship. Ann Intern Med.1983;98(2):243-248. (Editorial)
- Opel DJ. A push for progress with shared decision-making in pediatrics. Pediatrics.2017;139(2):e20162526. (Research support, non-U.S. government)
- Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Committee on Bioethics. Consent for emergency medical services for children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011;128(2):427-433. (Policy statement) DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-1166
- Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20161484. (Technical report)
- Cordasco K. Chapter 39: obtaining informed consent from patients: brief update review. In: Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, et al. Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013:461-471. (Review)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Abt Associates, The Joint Commission. Making Informed Consent an Informed Choice: Training for Health Care Professionals. Accessed April 15, 2021. (Training module)
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Revisions to the hospital interpretive guidelines for informed consent. Accessed April 15, 2021. (U.S. government document)
- English A, Bass L, Boyle AD, et al. State Minor Consent Laws: A Summary. 3rd ed. Chapel Hill: Center for Adolescent Health & the Law; 2010. (Policy resource and education paper)
- Guttmacher Institute. An overview of minors’ consent law. State policies in brief. Accessed April 15, 2021. (Website)
- Flynn D, Knoedler MA, Hess EP, et al. Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(8):959-967. (Systematic review)
- Weiss EM, Clark JD, Heike CL, et al. Gaps in the implementation of shared decision-making: illustrative cases. Pediatrics. 2019;143(3):e20183055. (Case reports) DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-3055
- Boisaubin EV, Dresser R. Informed consent in emergency care: illusion and reform. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16(1):62-67. (Review of survey results)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Health Literacy. Accessed April 15, 2021. (U.S. government resource)
- Garner BA, Black’s Law Dictionary. 9th ed: U.S.A.: West; 2009. (Legal reference)
- The Joint Commission, Division of Health Care Improvement. Informed Consent: More than Getting a Signature. Quick Safety. 2016(21). (Advisory article)
- 42 Code of Federal Regulations § 482. 24 - Condition of participation: Medical record services. Accessed April 15, 2021. (Legal information)
- Jones RC, Holden T. A guide to assessing decision-making capacity. Cleve Clin J Med.2004;71(12):971-975. (Review)
- Grisso T, Applebaum PS. Abilities related to competence. In: Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998:31-60. (Book chapter)
- Berg JW, Applebeum PS, Lidz C, et al. Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. 2nd ed. Fair Lawn: Oxford University Press; 2001. (Book)
- Moore GP, Moffett PM, Fider C, et al. What emergency physicians should know about informed consent: legal scenarios, cases, and caveats. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(8):922-927. (Review)
- American Medical Association. Chapter 2: opinions on consent, communication & decision making. AMA Code of Medical Ethics. Accessed April 15, 2021. (AMA guideline)
- Canterbury v Spence, 464 F2d 772 (DC Cir 1972). Accessed April 15, 2021. (Case brief)
- Maughan RR. Nixdorf v Hicken, 612 P2d 348 (Utah 1980). Accessed April 15, 2021. (Legal opinion)
- Murray B. Informed consent: what must a physician disclose to a patient? Virtual Mentor.2012;14(7):563-566. (Health law review)
- Braddock CH 3rd, Fihn SD, Levinson W, et al. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions. Informed decision making in the outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med.1997;12(6):339-345. (Research support, U.S. government, non-Public Health Service funded)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Teach-Back: Intervention. Accessed April 15, 2021. (U.S. government resource)
- Yen PH, Leasure AR. Use and effectiveness of the teach-back method in patient education and health outcomes. Fed Pract. 2019;36(6):284-289. (Systematic research)
- Fernandez Lynch H, Joffe S, Feldman EA. Informed consent and the role of the treating physician. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2433-2438. (Review)
- Robeznieks A. Informed-consent ruling may have “far-reaching, negative impact”Accessed April 15, 2021. (Opinion)
- Rettig PJ. Can a minor refuse assent for emergency care? Virtual Mentor. 2012;14(10):763-766. (Case reports)
- Woolley SL. The limits of parental responsibility regarding medical treatment decisions. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(11):1060-1065. (Review)
- Woolley S. Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights? Emerg Med J. 2005;22(12):869-871. (Review) DOI: 10.1136/emj.2004.023382
- Coleman DL, Rosoff PM. The legal authority of mature minors to consent to general medical treatment. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):786-793. (Review)
- 42 Code of Federal Regulations § 482. 13 - Condition of participation: patient’s rights. Accessed April 15, 2021. (Legal information)
- Adams RC, Levy SE. Shared decision-making and children with disabilities: pathways to consensus. Pediatrics. 2017;139(6):e20170956. (Clinical report)
- Katz AL, Webb SA, Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20161485. (Review)
- O’Malley P, Brown K, Mace SE. Patient- and family-centered care and the role of the emergency physician providing care to a child in the emergency department. Pediatrics.2006;118(5):2242-2244. (Review)
- Rossi WC, Reynolds W, Nelson RM. Child assent and parental permission in pediatric research. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003;24(2):131-148. (Research support, U.S. Public Health Service)
- Lee KJ, Havens PL, Sato TT, et al. Assent for treatment: clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):723-730. (Review)
- Batterman N. Under age: a minor’s right to consent to health care. Touro Law Rev.1994;10(3):637-678. (Law review)
- Lane SH, Kohlenberg E. Emancipated minors: health policy and implications for nursing. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012;27(5):533-548. (Review)
- Davis M, Fang A. Emancipated Minor. StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2020. (eBook)
- Benjamin L, Ishimine P, Joseph M, et al. Evaluation and treatment of minors. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(2):225-232. (Review)
- Moore JD. Consent to Medical Treatment for Minor Children: Overview of North Carolina Law. Accessed April 15, 2021. (Legal overview)
- Kerwin ME, Kirby KC, Speziali D, et al. What can parents do? A review of state laws regarding decision making for adolescent drug abuse and mental health treatment. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2015;24(3):166-176. (Review)
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Conflicts between religious or spiritual beliefs and pediatric care: informed refusal, exemptions, and public funding. Pediatrics. 2013;132(5):962-965. (Policy statement)
- Stoker M, Landry A. Faith and religion in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med.2015;22(1):124-124. (Opinion)
- Green appeal. Accessed April 15, 2021. (Legal case summary)
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Custody of a Minor, 379 N.E.2d 1053 (Mass. 1978). (Legal case)
- Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944). (Legal case summary)
- Strassburger Z. Medical decision making for youth in the foster care system. J Marshall L Rev. 2016;49(49):4. (Law review)
- Task Force on Health Care for Children in Foster Care. Medical consents for children and adolescents in foster care. Fostering health. Health Care for Children and Adolescents in Foster Care. 2nd ed: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2005. (Textbook)
- Fanaroff JM. Consent by proxy for nonurgent pediatric care. Pediatrics.2017;139(2):e20163911. (Clinical report)
- Code of ethics for emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(1):e7-e15. (ACEP policy statement)
- Survey and Certification Group, Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for hospitals, critical access hospitals (CAHs) and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) related to various rules reducing provider/supplier burden. Ref: S&C: 13-20-Acute Care.2013:34. (Published rule)
- Patel PB, Gilchrist A, Cronan KM, et al. Adequacy of informed consent for lumbar puncture in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010;26(10):739-741. (Retrospective chart review; 336 patients)
- Richards EP, Rathbun KC. Schoendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914). Medical Care Law: Aspen; 1999:497. (Case review)
Want more?
Get the full article 👇