Action
Esophageal location
- After consulting GI, and if it will not cause a delay in management, administer 10 mL honey or sucralfate if age >12 mo and ingestion <12 hr (Class II)
- If in referral center, activate cluster notification of GI, ENT, and GI surgery
Gastric and intestinal location
- If asymptomatic gastric button battery is <2 cm or patient age is >5 yr, 24-48 hr follow-up for repeat x-ray (Class III)
- If button battery is beyond endoscopic reach and patient is asymptomatic, discharge with repeat x-ray in 24-48 hr
Background
Button Batteries
BBs exert multiple pathologic effects on the GI tract when ingested. If the battery’s electrodes (the flat sides) closely contact the moist mucosal walls of the GI tract (as commonly occurs in the esophagus), a direct, low-voltage current travels into the adjacent tissues and leads to the creation of hydroxide ions in surrounding tissues and a severe electrical burn. Studies in animal models observed that lithium-ion BBs can cause superficial burns within 15 minutes. An in vitro study placed BBs in normal saline and observed a release of black-brown precipitate and an alkalinization of the solution within 2.5 hours, where the pH increased from 5.0 to 10.0. In the same study, in vivo experiments observed mucosal damage in the GI tract of animals within 2 hours of BB placement.
In human ingestions, these effects can be seen clinically, although only approximately 0.5% of ingestions result in major complications. A systematic review of 24 case reports and 7 articles demonstrated that complications are most commonly seen with lithium-ion BBs, larger BBs (>2 cm) and BBs that are new or unused. Complications include ulceration (22%), perforation (18%), and stricture (13%). A devastating complication of BB ingestion, an aorto-esophageal fistula, can present up to 18 days after BB removal, due to ulcerative healing leading to fistula formation and massive GI hemorrhage. A systematic review found vascular hemorrhage to be the most common cause of death from BB ingestion; only 18% of vascular hemorrhage cases from the National Poison Center registry were deemed survivable.
Treatment
Button batteries in the esophagus should be removed endoscopically as quickly as possible—ideally within 2 hours—regardless of symptoms, battery type, or size. There is more controversy surrounding the treatment of gastric and intestinal button batteries (see below). The National Button Battery Hotline at 1-800-498-8666, based out of the Rocky Mountain Poison Center in Denver, CO, can be a resource in complicated cases and provides 24/7 guidance to clinicians.
If the patient is older than 12 months, honey is one measure that can be taken while awaiting endoscopy. (Honey for infants <12 months is not recommended due to the risk for infant botulism.) Animal studies have shown that honey and sucralfate neutralize the elevated tissue pH that results from alkaline batteries, and decreases the thickness and size of burns in vivo. Exceptions to the pre-endoscopy nil per os (NPO) rule can be made in the ED in order to give 5 to 10 mL of pure honey or sucralfate to patients who are able to tolerate it if the ingestion was within 12 hours. The National Capital Poison Center recommends up to 6 doses, given every 10 minutes.
A multidisciplinary, team-based approach to definitive management is necessary to address any potential complications that may occur. Published algorithms for BB management include cluster notification of otolaryngology, gastroenterology, and GI surgery. Endoscopy should ideally be performed in the operating room so that cases of perforation of hemorrhage can be addressed quickly. If clinicians are working at a critical access hospital with limited subspecialty coverage, every effort should be made to transfer the patient directly to the operating room at a referral center.
- Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Beuhler MC, et al. 2021 annual report of the National Poison Data System© (NPDS) from America’s Poison Centers: 39th annual report. Clin Toxicol.2022;60(12):1381-1643. (Database analysis)
- Abraham B, Alao AO. An unusual foreign body ingestion in a schizophrenic patient: case report. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2005;35(3):313-318. (Case report)
- Lee SB, Lee RK, Suh JH, et al. A case of wooden foreign-body ingestion. J Emerg Med.2018;54(1):121-123. (Case report)
- Yonemoto S, Uesato M, Aoyama H, et al. A double-scope technique enabled a patient with an esophageal plastic fork foreign body to avoid surgery: a case report and review of the literature. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2022;15(1):66-70. (Case report)
- Erbil B, Karaca MA, Aslaner MA, et al. Emergency admissions due to swallowed foreign bodies in adults. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(38):6447. (Retrospective; 100 patients)
- Ambe P, Weber SA, Schauer M, et al. Swallowed foreign bodies in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(50):869-875. (Review)
- Orsagh-Yentis D, McAdams RJ, Roberts KJ, et al. Foreign-body ingestions of young children treated in us emergency departments: 1995–2015. Pediatrics.2019;143(5):e20181988. (Retrospective reivew; 759,074 patients)
- Faguy K. Imaging foreign bodies. Radiol Technol. 2014;85(6):655-682. (Review)
- Ikenberry SO, Jue TL, Anderson MA, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(6):1085-1091. (Review) DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.010
- Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez P, et al. Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGA) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2016;48(05):489-496. (Society guidelines) DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100456
- Yalçin S, Karnak I, Ciftci AO, et al. Foreign body ingestion in children: an analysis of pediatric surgical practice. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23(8):755-761. (Retrospective; 112 patients)
- Mosca S, Manes G, Martino R, et al. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: report on a series of 414 adult patients. Endoscopy. 2001;33(8):692-696. (Case series; 414 patients)
- Sung SH, Jeon SW, Son HS, et al. Factors predictive of risk for complications in patients with oesophageal foreign bodies. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43(8):632-635. (Retrospective; 316 patients)
- Evans DC, Wojda TR, Jones CD, et al. Intentional ingestions of foreign objects among prisoners: a review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7(3):162-168. (Systematic review; 13 studies)
- Athanassiadi K, Gerazounis M, Metaxas E, et al. Management of esophageal foreign bodies: a retrospective review of 400 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21(4):653-656. (Retrospective study; 400 patients)
- Velitchkov NG, Grigorov GI, Losanoff JE, et al. Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract: retrospective analysis of 542 cases. World J Surg. 1996;20(8):1001-1005. (Retrospective; 542 patients)
- Hardman J, Sharma N, Smith J, et al. Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5(5):CD007352. (Systematic review; 1 study, 43 patients)
- Weiland ST, Schurr MJ. Conservative management of ingested foreign bodies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(3):496-500. (Retrospective; 22 patients)
- Campbell EA, Wilbert CD. Foreign Body Imaging. StatPearls [Internet]2022. (Online textbook chapter)
- Berggreen PJ, Edwyn Harrison M, Sanowski RA, et al. Techniques and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in children and adults. Gastrointest Endosc.1993;39(5):626-630. (Retrospective; 76 adults, 116 children)
- Panieri E, Bass DH. The management of ingested foreign bodies in children--a review of 663 cases. Eur J Emerg Med. 1995;2(2):83-87. (Retrospective; 663 patients)
- Salessiotis N. Measurement of the diameter of the pylorus in man: part I. Experimental project for clinical application. Am J Surg. 1972;124(3):331-333. (Review)
- Murari A, Piukala S. An ingested toothbrush. Pac Health Dialog. 2010;16(2):75-77. (Case report)
- Kirk AD, Bowers BA, Moylan JA, et al. Toothbrush swallowing. Arch Surg.1988;123(3):382-384. (Case reports; 4 cases)
- Mesa-López MJ, Martínez-Camacho C, Mesa F. Accidentally swallowing a toothbrush in a patient during a vomiting attempt: literature review and case report. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):2682. (Case reports; 3 patients)
- Oliva S, Romano C, De Angelis P, et al. Foreign body and caustic ingestions in children: a clinical practice guideline. Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52(11):1266-1281. (Society guidelines)
- Hachimi-Idrissi S, Corne L, Vandenplas Y. Management of ingested foreign bodies in childhood: our experience and review of the literature. Eur J Emerg Med. 1998;5(3):319-323. (Retrospective; 174 patients)
- Schweich P. Management of coin ingestion: any change? Pediatr Emerg Care. 1995;11(1):37-39. (Review)
- Valentino W, Sharifi-Amina S. Esophageal food impaction. Radiol Case Rep.2022;17(9):2979-2982. (Case report)
- Byrne KR, Panagiotakis PH, Hilden K, et al. Retrospective analysis of esophageal food impaction: differences in etiology by age and gender. Dig Dis Sci.52(3):717-721.(Retrospective; 85 patients)
- Longstreth GF, Longstreth KJ, Yao JF. Esophageal food impaction: epidemiology and therapy. A retrospective, observational study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(2):193-198.(Retrospective; 194 patients)
- Mahesh VN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ. Changing epidemiology of food bolus impaction: is eosinophilic esophagitis to blame? J Gastroenterol Hepatol.2013;28(6):963-966. (Retrospective; 539 patients)
- Sperry SLW, Crockett SD, Miller CB, et al. Esophageal foreign-body impactions: epidemiology, time trends, and the impact of the increasing prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(5):985-991. (Retrospective; 548 patients)
- Başer M, Arslantürk H, Kisli E, et al. Primary aortoduodenal fistula due to a swallowed sewing needle: a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg.2007;13(2):154-157. (Case report)
- Cheng W, Tam PKH. Foreign-body ingestion in children: experience with 1,265 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(10):1472-1476. (Retrospective; 1265 patients)
- Mulita F, Papadopoulos G, Tsochatzis S, et al. Laparoscopic removal of an ingested fish bone from the head of the pancreas: case report and review of literature. Pan Afr Med J.2020;36:123. (Case report)
- Braumann C, Goette O, Menenakos C, et al. Laparoscopic removal of ingested pin penetrating the gastric wall in an immunosuppressed patient. Surg Endosc.2004;18(5):870. (Case report)
- Paul RI, Jaffe DM. Sharp object ingestions in children: illustrative cases and literature review. Pediatric Emerg Care. 1988;4(4):245. (Case reports; 3 cases)
- Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L, et al. Emerging battery-ingestion hazard: clinical implications. Pediatrics. 2010;125(6):1168-1177. (Database review; 65,183 cases) DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-3037
- McConnell MK. When button batteries become breakfast: the hidden dangers of button battery ingestion. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013;28(6):e42-e49. (Review)
- Li M, Lu J, Chen Z, et al. 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater.2018;30(33):1800561. (Review)
- Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L. Preventing battery ingestions: an analysis of 8648 cases. Pediatrics. 2010;125(6):1178-1183. (Retrospective; 8648 patients)
- Kramer RE, Lerner DG, Lin T, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies in children: a clinical report of the NASPGHAN endoscopy committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60(4):562-574. (Society guidelines)
- Samad L, Ali M, Ramzi H. Button battery ingestion: hazards of esophageal impaction. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(10):1527-1531. (Case reports; 3 patients)
- Votteler TP, Nash JC, Rutledge JC. The hazard of ingested alkaline disk batteries in children. JAMA. 1983;249(18):2504-2506. (Case reports; 8 patients)
- Varga Á, Kovács T, Saxena AK. Analysis of complications after button battery ingestion in children. Pediatric Emerg Care. 2018;34(6):443. (Systematic review; 31 studies, 6262 patients)
- Brumbaugh DE, Colson SB, Sandoval JA, et al. Management of button battery–induced hemorrhage in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;52(5):585. (Retrospective; 10 patients)
- Akinkugbe O, James AL, Ostrow O, et al. Vascular complications in children following button battery ingestions: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2022;150(3):e2022057477.(Systematic review, 361 patients)
- Naji H, Isacson D, Svensson JF, et al. Bowel injuries caused by ingestion of multiple magnets in children: a growing hazard. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28(4):367-374.(Retrospective review; 8 patients)
- Fenton SJ, Torgenson M, Holsti M, et al. Magnetic attraction leading to a small bowel obstruction in a child. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23(12):1245-1247. (Case report)
- George AT, Motiwale S. Magnets, children and the bowel: a dangerous attraction? World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(38):5324-5328. (Review)
- Abbas MI, Oliva-Hemker M, Choi J, et al. Magnet ingestions in children presenting to U.S. emergency departments, 2002–2011. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(1):18.(Database analysis)
- Tavarez MM, Saladino RA, Gaines BA, et al. Prevalence, clinical features and management of pediatric magnetic foreign body ingestions. J Emerg Med.2013;44(1):261-268. (Retrospective; 38 patients)
- Neoballs: Marketplace by Zen Magnets. Micromagnets. Accessed April 10, 2023. (Product website)
- Hussain SZ, Bousvaros A, Gilger M, et al. Management of ingested magnets in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55(3):239. (Review)
- United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC approves new federal safety standard for magnets to prevent deaths and serious injuries from high-powered magnet ingestion. Release date: September 7, 2022. (Press release)
- American Academy of Pediatrics. New safety standard to protect children from high-powered magnets takes effect. Accessed April 10, 2023. (Society news release)
- Cawich SO, Thomas DA, Mohammed F, et al. A management algorithm for retained rectal foreign bodies. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11(3):684-692. (Review)
- Ploner M, Gardetto A, Ploner F, et al. Foreign rectal body - systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2020;83(1):61-65. (Systematic review and meta-analysis; 54 studies)
- Ozbilgin M, Arslan B, Yakut MC, et al. Five years with a rectal foreign body: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;6:210-213. (Case report)
- Kurer MA, Davey C, Khan S, et al. Colorectal foreign bodies: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(9):851-861. (Systematic review; 193 patients)
- Cevik M, Gókdemir MT, Boleken ME, et al. The characteristics and outcomes of foreign body ingestion and aspiration in children due to lodged foreign body in the aerodigestive tract. Pediatric Emerg Care. 2013;29(1):53-57. (Retrospective; 192 patients)
- Järvenpää P, Arkkila P, Aaltonen L-M. Globus pharyngeus: a review of etiology, diagnostics, and treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(8):1945-1953. (Review)
- Khorana J, Tantivit Y, Phiuphong C, et al. Foreign body ingestion in pediatrics: distribution, management and complications. Medicina. 2019;55(10):686.(Retrospective; 194 patients)
- Arana A, Hauser B, Hachimi-Idrissi S, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies in childhood and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr. 2001;160(8):468-472.(Retrospective; 325 patients)
- Eastland N. Quick coin battery guide. Accessed April 10, 2023. (Website)
- Microbattery. Making sense of battery certifications and nomenclature. Accessed April 10, 2023. (Website)
- Sinclair K. Button and cylindrical battery ingestion: clinical features, diagnosis, and initial management. UpToDate. Updated June 2, 2022. Accessed April 10, 2023. (Review)
- Guelfguat M, Kaplinskiy V, Reddy SH, et al. Clinical guidelines for imaging and reporting ingested foreign bodies. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(1):37-53. (Review)
- Tseng H-J, Hanna TN, Shuaib W, et al. Imaging foreign bodies: ingested, aspirated, and inserted. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66(6):570-582. (Review) DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.07.499
- Ngan JH, Fok PJ, Lai EC, et al. A prospective study on fish bone ingestion. Experience of 358 patients. Ann Surg. 1990;211(4):459-462. (Prospective; 358 patients)
- Ciriza C, García L, Suárez P, et al. What predictive parameters best indicate the need for emergent gastrointestinal endoscopy after foreign body ingestion? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;31(1):23-28. (Retrospective analysis; 122 patients)
- Sink JR, Kitsko DJ, Mehta DK, et al. Diagnosis of pediatric foreign body ingestion: clinical presentation, physical examination, and radiologic findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(4):342-350. (Retrospective; 543 patients)
- Liew CJY, Poh ACC, Tan TY. Finding Nemo: imaging findings, pitfalls, and complications of ingested fish bones in the alimentary canal. Emerg Radiology.2013;20(4):311-322. (Review)
- Lue AJ, Fang WD, Manolidis S. Use of plain radiography and computed tomography to identify fish bone foreign bodies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123(4):435-438. (In vitro experiment)
- Cologne KG, Ault GT. Rectal foreign bodies: what is the current standard? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2012;25(4):214-218. (Review)
- Assiri H, Alshareef W, Aldriweesh B, et al. Coin retained in the upper esophagus for more than 4 years: a case report and literature review. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022 Jun 7:1455613221106212. (Case report)
- Pugh A, Schunk J, Ryan S. A 3-year-old boy with rapid obstructive symptoms secondary to coin ingestion and gastric impaction. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open.2021;2(1):e12382. (Case report)
- Ferrari D, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, et al. Flexible versus rigid endoscopy in the management of esophageal foreign body impaction: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13(1):42. (Systematic review and meta-analysis; 736 cases of flexible endosocopy and 666 rigid endosocopy)
- Li Z-S, Sun Z-X, Zou D-W, et al. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper-GI tract: experience with 1088 cases in China. Gastrointest Endosc.2006;64(4):485-492. (Retrospective; 1088 patients)
- Warner TN, Genereux M, Price AB, et al. Esophageal bougienage for management of lodged esophageal coins: safe, effective, efficient, and underused. Pediatric Emerg Care. 2022;38(11):589-597. (Retrospective; 205 patients)
- Schunk JE, Harrison AM, Corneli HM, et al. Fluoroscopic Foley catheter removal of esophageal foreign bodies in children: experience with 415 episodes. Pediatrics.1994;94(5):709-714. (Retrospective; 415 patients)
- Arnold JE, Radkowski D. Foley catheter and esophageal foreign bodies. Pediatrics.1995;96(4 Pt 1):791. (Editorial reply)
- Loh KS, Tan LK, Smith JD, et al. Complications of foreign bodies in the esophagus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123(5):613-616. (Retrospective case-control study; 273 patients)
- Waltzman ML. Management of esophageal coins. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(5):571-574.(Review)
- Waltzman ML, Baskin M, Wypij D, et al. A randomized clinical trial of the management of esophageal coins in children. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):614-619. (Randomized, prospective; 168 patients) DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-2555
- Conners GP, Cobaugh DJ, Feinberg R, et al. Home observation for asymptomatic coin ingestion: acceptance and outcomes. The New York State Poison Control Center Coin Ingestion Study Group. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6(3):213-217. (Survey; 67 participants)
- Anfang RR, Jatana KR, Linn RL, et al. pH-neutralizing esophageal irrigations as a novel mitigation strategy for button battery injury. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(1):49-57.(Cadaveric and animal experiment)
- National Capital Poison Center. National Capital Poison Center Button Battery Ingestion Triage and Treatment Guideline. Accessed April 10, 2023. (Guideline recommendations)
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Emergency Department Clinical Pathway for the Evaluation/Treatment of Children With Foreign Body Ingestion. Accessed April 10, 2023. (Pediatric hospital published guidelines)
- Lake JP, Essani R, Petrone P, et al. Management of retained colorectal foreign bodies: predictors of operative intervention. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1694-1698.(Retrospective; 93 patients)
- Ooi B-S, Ho Y-K, Eu K-W, et al. Management of anorectal foreign bodies: a cause of obscure anal pain. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68(12):852-855. (Retrospective; 30 patients)
- Barone JE, Sohn N, Nealon TF. Perforations and foreign bodies of the rectum: report of 28 cases. Ann Surg. 1976;184(5):601-604. (Case series; 28 patients)
- Sayılır A, Düzgün IN, Güvendi B. Treatment of unusual rectal foreign body using a Foley catheter. Endoscopy. 2014;46 Suppl 1 UCTN:E182-E183. (Case report)
- Beecher SM, O’Leary DP, McLaughlin R. Diagnostic dilemmas due to fish bone ingestion: case report & literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;13:112-115. (Case report and review)
- Akazawa Y, Watanabe S, Nobukiyo S, et al. The management of possible fishbone ingestion. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004;31(4):413-416. (Prospective observational; 76 patients)
- Kim JP, Kwon OJ, Shim HS, et al. Analysis of clinical feature and management of fish bone ingestion of upper gastrointestinal tract. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;8(3):261-267. (Prospective observational study; 286 patients)
- Traub S, Hoffman R, Nelson L. Body packing — the internal concealment of illicit drugs. N Eng J Med. 2003;349(26):2519-2526. (Review)
- Bogusz MJ, Althoff H, Erkens M, et al. Internally concealed cocaine: analytical and diagnostic aspects. J Forensic Sci. 1995;40(5):811-815. (Retrospective review; 30 patients)
- Farmer JW, Chan SB. Whole body irrigation for contraband bodypackers. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;37(2):147-150. (Retrospective case series; 16 cases)
- Visser L, Stricker B, Hoogendoorn M, et al. Do not give paraffin to packers. Lancet.1998;352(9137):1352. (Case report)
- Colon V, Grade A, Pulliam G, et al. Effect of doses of glucagon used to treat food impaction on esophageal motor function of normal subjects. Dysphagia. 1999;14(1):27-30. (In vivo experiment; 10 patients)
- Tibbling L, Bjorkhoel A, Jansson E, et al. Effect of spasmolytic drugs on esophageal foreign bodies. Dysphagia. 1995;10(2):126-127. (Prospective, randomized; 43 patients)
- Mehta D, Attia M, Quintana E, et al. Glucagon use for esophageal coin dislodgment in children: a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(2):200-203. (Prospective randomized controlled trial; 20 patients)
- Al-Haddad M, Ward EM, Scolapio JS, et al. Glucagon for the relief of esophageal food impaction does it really work? Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51(11):1930-1933. (Retrospective; 85 patients)
- Sodeman TC, Harewood GC, Baron TH. Assessment of the predictors of response to glucagon in the setting of acute esophageal food bolus impaction. Dysphagia.2004;19(1):18-21. (Retrospective; 222 patients)
- Arora S, Galich P. Myth: glucagon is an effective first-line therapy for esophageal foreign body impaction. Can J Emerg Med.11(2):169-171. (Review)
- Honda S, Shinkai M, Usui Y, et al. Severe gastric damage caused by button battery ingestion in a 3-month-old infant. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(9):e23-e26. (Case report)