Action
- Initiate urgent neurosurgical consultation
- Transfer to ICU/ neurosurgical care (Class I)
- ED management considerations (See background section below)
- Admit to specialized neurosciences ICU. (Class I)
- Order bed rest and nothing by mouth.
- Manage blood pressure. (Class II)
- Administer nimodipine for vasospasm prophylaxis. (Class I)
- Implement seizure prophylaxis. (Class III)
- Perform reversal of anticoagulated patients. (Class II)
Decision
Perform cerebrovascular imaging (Class I). Aneurysm Seen?
Yes
- Send for early aneurysm repair (Class II)
No
- Provide further care per consultant for non-aneurysmal etiology
Background
Blood Pressure Management
In theory, higher pressures may increase the risk of rebleeding, whereas lower pressures may compromise cerebral perfusion pressure, leading to cerebral ischemia. A retrospective study of 134 patients with SAH, 80 of whom had systolic blood pressure reduced to <100 mm Hg, found that while rebleeding occurred in 15% of patients treated with antihypertensives, compared with 33% in the untreated group, the rates of cerebral infarction in the treatment group were nearly twice that of the nontreatment group (40 vs 22%). Whether acute hypertension definitively increases rebleeding risk is still a controversial subject, based on the conflicting results of recent studies.
Although there are conflicting data on the causal relationship of the occurrence of hypertension in SAH patients, there may be some relationship between premorbid hypertension and both poor prognosis and higher severity of disease on presentation. Acute management, however, has not been clearly demonstrated to alter clinical outcome. There are no conclusive data pointing to a target blood pressure or the ideal antihypertensive agent in the management of SAH, so these choices should follow the protocols of the consulting neurosurgical or neurointensive care team. The authors recommend the collaborative development and utilization of regional protocols to help guide management of these patients at every point in the system of care. The 2012 AHA/ASA guidelines recommended that from the time of symptom onset to obliteration of the aneurysm, blood pressure should be controlled with a titratable agent, with a goal systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg. The guidelines note that an evidence-based goal has yet to be identified but that systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg is a reasonable target. Titratable intravenous agents may include labetalol, nicardipine, clevidipine, and esmolol. Clevidipine, an intravenous dihydropyridine with a pharmacokinetic profile similar to that of nicardipine, has not been studied extensively in SAH patients. Due to the addition of an ester linkage, it has a half-life of <1 minute and may therefore require less titration. Nitroprusside should be avoided due to its tendency to increase intracranial pressure and the potential for toxicity with prolonged infusion. If the patient is expected to remain in the ED for an extended period of time, an arterial catheter may be inserted to facilitate continuous blood pressure monitoring.
Prevention of Vasospasm
Cerebral vasospasm is a delayed complication that may develop several days up to 2 weeks post aSAH, with a peak incidence at 7 to 10 days after the event. Vasospasm may be asymptomatic or may lead to delayed neurologic deterioration, which can cause significant morbidity related to aSAH.196 Nimodipine, a calcium-channel blocker, has been shown to reduce the occurrence of secondary ischemia with a favorable trend toward reducing case fatality. In a Cochrane review of 16 trials of calcium antagonists, nimodipine had a risk ratio of 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81. The statistical significance of this review rests heavily on the largest randomized controlled trial of 554 patients, from which the standard dosing regimen is derived. Nimodipine 60 mg can be administered orally every 4 hours, even starting in the ED. If the patient is unable to swallow, nimodipine should be crushed and given via a nasogastric tube, as there is no evidence for the efficacy of intravenous nimodipine. Nimodipine should be given to hemodynamically stable patients and in consultation with the specialist team. Note that nimodipine is part of the comprehensive stroke center measures and does not necessarily need to be administered in the ED. Nicardipine, another calcium-channel blocker, has also been shown to decrease vasospasm in a randomized trial but without any improvement in outcome.
Intravenous magnesium sulfate has not been shown to be effective in vasospasm prophylaxis. Statins had shown some promise in early literature for preventing vasospasm, and some trials showed decreases in vasospasm incidence with no improvement in delayed cerebral ischemia or mortality. However, more recent studies on statin use in aSAH have shown no statistical difference in occurrence of cerebral vasospasm or delayed cerebral ischemia; therefore, statins are no longer recommended for prevention.
Seizure Prophylaxis
Up to 20% of patients have a seizure during or soon after aSAH. Although there are no randomized controlled trials on the prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), seizures can result in rebleeding from an unsecured aneurysm, so AEDs are commonly used in the acute period.
Phenytoin has been associated with worse outcomes, especially with prolonged use. Data from 4 multicenter randomized controlled trials of aSAH were pooled to identify associations with AED use in aSAH. The analysis of 3552 patients admitted with aSAH found increased in-hospital complications and worse outcomes after antiepileptic therapy, based on GCS score, neurologic deterioration, and vasospasm. Another prospective study of 527 patients with SAH found that higher serum phenytoin levels were associated with functional decline and cognitive disability at 2 weeks and 3 months. A review of 7000 aSAH patients given AEDs found a 2.2% early seizure rate and a 5.5% late seizure rate, with no difference between the patients who received some course of AEDs and those who received no AEDs.
Common practice may include a short course (<3 days) of an AED versus using an AED until the aneurysm is secured, based on data showing that short courses have the same benefit of low in-hospital postoperative seizure rate (<2%) when compared with longer courses, without the cumulative adverse effects of the drugs. In a patient who has not already seized, it is reasonable to defer AED initiation to the inpatient management service given limited data to support efficacy in the early phase. This is best done in accordance with protocol developed at local institutions. If used for prophylaxis, an AED with a better side-effect profile, such as levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily, can be used.
Evidence-based medicine requires a critical appraisal of the literature based upon study methodology and number of subjects. Not all references are equally robust. The findings of a large, prospective, random-ized, and blinded trial should carry more weight than a case report.
- Edlow JA, Malek AM, Ogilvy CS. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: update for emergency physicians. J Emerg Med. 2008;34(3):237-251. (Review)
- Fukuda T, Hasue M, Ito H. Does traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by diffuse brain injury cause delayed ischemic brain damage? Comparison with subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(5):1040-1049. (Retrospective; 99 patients, 114 patients)
- Suarez JI, Tarr RW, Selman WR. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):387-396. (Review) DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra052732
- Carvi y Nievas MN, Archavlis E. Atypical causes of nontraumatic intracranial subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009;111(4):354-358. (Retrospective; 820 patients)
- Godwin SA, Cherkas DS, Panagos PD, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;74(4):e41-e74. (Practice guidelines, systematic review) DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.009
- Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1711-1737. (Practice guidelines) DOI: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839
- Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Claude Hemphill J 3rd, et al. Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(2):211-240. (Practice guidelines) DOI: 10.1007/s12028-011-9605-9
- Bederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40(3):994-1025. (Practice guidelines, systematic review) DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.191395
- Findlay JM. Current management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines from the Canadian Neurosurgical Society. Can J Neurol Sci. 1997;24(2):161-170. (Practice guidelines, systematic review)
- Broderick J, Connolly S, Feldmann E, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Stroke. 2007;38(6):2001-2023. (Practice guidelines, systematic review)
- Masdeu JC, Irimia P, Asenbaum S, et al. EFNS guideline on neuroimaging in acute stroke. Report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13(12):1271-1283. (Practice guidelines, systematic review, and expert consensus)
- Martin V EA. Diagnosis and classification of primary headache disorders. In: Standards of Care for Headache Diagnosis and Treatment. Paper presented at: National Headache Foundation. 2004; Chicago, IL. (Guidelines)
- Ingall T, Asplund K, Mahonen M, et al. A multinational comparison of subarachnoid hemorrhage epidemiology in the WHO MONICA stroke study. Stroke. 2000;31(5):1054-1061. (Prospective international multicenter; 3368 patients)
- Kozak N, Hayashi M. Trends in the incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage in Akita Prefecture, Japan. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(2):234-238. (Retrospective; 3257 patients)
- King JT Jr. Epidemiology of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1997;7(4):659-668. (Re-view)
- Broderick JP, Viscoli CM, Brott T, et al. Major risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the young are modifiable. Stroke. 2003;34(6):1375-1381. (Retrospective; 425 patients)
- Juvela S, Hillbom M, Numminen H, et al. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption as risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1993;24(5):639-646. (Retrospective; 592 patients)
- Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, et al. A prospective study of moderate alcohol consumption and the risk of coronary disease and stroke in women. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(5):267-273. (Prospective; 87,526 subjects, 334,382 person-years)
- Donahue RP, Abbott RD, Reed DM, et al. Alcohol and hemorrhagic stroke. The Honolulu Heart Program. JAMA. 1986;255(17):2311-2314. (Prospective; 8006 patients)
- van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage: diagnosis, causes and management. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 2):249-278. (Review)
- Okamoto K, Horisawa R, Kawamura T, et al. Family history and risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage: a case-control study in Nagoya, Japan. Stroke. 2003;34(2):422-426. (Prospective; 195 patients)
- Wang PS, Longstreth WT Jr, Koepsell TD. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and family history. A population-based case-control study. Arch Neurol. 1995;52(2):202-204. (Prospective; 149 patients)
- Mhurchu CN, Anderson C, Jamrozik K, et al. Hormonal factors and risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an international population-based, case-control study. Stroke. 2001;32(3):606-612. (Prospective; 268 patients)
- Gaist D, Pedersen L, Cnattingius S, et al. Parity and risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage in women: a nested case-control study based on national Swedish registries. Stroke. 2004;35(1):28-32. (Retrospective; 887 cases)
- Yang CY, Chang CC, Kuo HW, et al. Parity and risk of death from subarachnoid hemorrhage in women: evidence from a cohort in Taiwan. Neurology. 2006;67(3):514-515. (Vital statistics database review; 1,292,462 patients)
- Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Yahia AM, et al. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2001;49(3):607-612. (Retrospective; 323 patients)
- Rinkel GJ, van Gijn J, Wijdicks EF. Subarachnoid hemorrhage without detectable aneurysm. A review of the causes. Stroke. 1993;24(9):1403-1409. (Review)
- van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):306-318. (Review)
- Heiskanen O. Ruptured intracranial arterial aneurysms of children and adolescents. Surgical and total management results. Childs Nerv Syst. 1989;5(2):66-70. (Retrospective; 16 patients)
- Stehbens WE. Etiology of intracranial berry aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1989;70(6):823-831. (Review)
- Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, et al. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(7):626-636. (Systematic review and meta-analysis; 68 studies, 94,912 patients)
- Juvela S, Poussa K, Lehto H, et al. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. Stroke. 2013;44(9):2414-2421. (Prospective; 142 patients)
- de Rooij NK, Linn FH, van der Plas JA, et al. Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(12):1365-1372. (Systematic review; 51 studies, 45,821,896 person-years)
- Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, et al. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(1):59-66. (Systematic review; 6 prospective studies, 8382 patients)
- Mackey J, Brown RD Jr, Moomaw CJ, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the Familial Intracranial Aneurysm and International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms cohorts: differences in multiplicity and location. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(1):60-64. (Prospective; 983 patients)
- Ishibashi T, Murayama Y, Urashima M, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: incidence of rupture and risk factors. Stroke. 2009;40(1):313-316. (Prospective; 419 patients)
- Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti ML, et al. Clinical decision rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute headache. JAMA. 2013;310(12):1248-1255. (Prospective; 2131 patients)
- Schievink WI, Karemaker JM, Hageman LM, et al. Circumstances surrounding aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg Neurol. 1989;32(4):266-272. (Retrospective; 500 patients)
- Fann JR, Kukull WA, Katon WJ, et al. Physical activity and subarachnoid haemorrhage: a population based case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69(6):768-772. (Retrospective; 149 patients)
- Anderson C, Ni Mhurchu C, Scott D, et al. Triggers of subarachnoid hemorrhage: role of physical exertion, smoking, and alcohol in the Australasian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study (ACROSS). Stroke. 2003;34(7):1771-1776. (Retrospective; 432 patients)
- Matsuda M, Watanabe K, Saito A, et al. Circumstances, activities, and events precipitating aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;16(1):25-29. (Retrospective; 513 patients)
- Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28(1):14-20. (Retrospective; 275 patients)
- Teasdale GM, Drake CG, Hunt W, et al. A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51(11):1457. (Prospective evaluation; 3521 patients)
- Degen LA, Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, et al. Interobserver variability of grading scales for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1546-1549. (Prospective evaluation; 50 patients)
- Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6(1):1-9. (Retrospective; 47 patients)
- Frontera JA, Claassen J, Schmidt JM, et al. Prediction of symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the modified Fisher scale. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(1):21-27. (Meta-analysis; 1355 patients)
- de Oliveira Manoel AL, Jaja BN, Germans MR, et al. The VASOGRADE: a simple grading scale for prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2015;46(7):1826-1831. (Systematic review; 746 patients)
- Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1998;42(5):959-968. (Retrospective; 72 patients)
- Goldstein JN, Camargo CA Jr, Pelletier AJ, et al. Headache in United States emergency departments: demographics, work-up and frequency of pathological diagnoses. Cephalalgia. 2006;26(6):684-690. (Retrospective; 21 million ED visits) DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01093.x
- Ramirez-Lassepas M, Espinosa CE, Cicero JJ, et al. Predictors of intracranial pathologic findings in patients who seek emergency care because of headache. Arch Neurol. 1997;54(12):1506-1509. (Retrospective case-control; 468 patients)
- Dhopesh V, Anwar R, Herring C. A retrospective assessment of emergency department patients with complaint of headache. Headache. 1979;19(1):37-42. (Retrospective chart review; 872 patients)
- Leicht MJ. Non-traumatic headache in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1980;9(8):404-409. (Retrospective; 872 patients)
- Linn FH, Wijdicks EF, van der Graaf Y, et al. Prospective study of sentinel headache in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 1994;344(8922):590-593. (Prospective; 148 patients)
- Wijdicks EF, Kerkhoff H, van Gijn J. Long-term follow-up of 71 patients with thunderclap headache mimicking subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 1988;2(8602):68-70. (Prospective; 71 patients)
- Landtblom AM, Fridriksson S, Boivie J, et al. Sudden onset headache: a prospective study of features, incidence and causes. Cephalalgia. 2002;22(5):354-360. (Prospective; 137 patients)
- Morgenstern LB, Luna-Gonzales H, Huber JC Jr, et al. Worst headache and subarachnoid hemorrhage: prospective, modern computed tomography and spinal fluid analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32(3 Pt 1):297-304. (Prospective; 107 patients)
- Bo SH, Davidsen EM, Gulbrandsen P, et al. Acute headache: a prospective diagnostic work-up of patients admitted to a general hospital. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15(12):1293-1299. (Prospective; 433 patients)
- Perry JJ, Spacek A, Forbes M, et al. Is the combination of negative computed tomography result and negative lumbar puncture result sufficient to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage? Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(6):707-713. (Prospective; 592 patients)
- Vermeulen MJ, Schull MJ. Missed diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage in the emergency department. Stroke. 2007;38(4):1216-1221. (Retrospective; 1507 patients)
- Kowalski RG, Claassen J, Kreiter KT, et al. Initial misdiagnosis and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. JAMA. 2004;291(7):866-869. (Retrospective; 482 patients) DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.7.866
- Mayer PL, Awad IA, Todor R, et al. Misdiagnosis of symptomatic cerebral aneurysm. Prevalence and correlation with outcome at four institutions. Stroke. 1996;27(9):1558-1563. (Retrospective; 217 patients)
- Vannemreddy P, Nanda A, Kelley R, et al. Delayed diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms: confounding factors in clinical presentation and the influence of misdiagnosis on outcome. South Med J. 2001;94(11):1108-1111. (Retrospective; 270 patients)
- Edlow JA, Caplan LR. Avoiding pitfalls in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(1):29-36. (Review) DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200001063420106